https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BIcAZxFfrc

So this entire video can be summed up as a strawman.

I'll explain from the position of someone who is not merely believing in a prescribed conspiracy (or conspiracies) but just generally lacking a lot of trust in A) Pharmaceutical Cartels and B) Governments.

It should be a given that both A and B are profoundly corrupt in ways that are non-controversial (already the generally-accepted matter-of-fact) and in ways we don't even know about.

Thalidomide Babies, Project Monarch, Operation Mockingbird, Operation Paperclip, MK ULTRA, The Tuskeegee Experiments, Project Artichoke, Warrantless Wiretapping...just to name a few

Then there's the one that depending on which side of the political isle you're on it's either definitely real or definitely fake:

Russian """"Interference"""" or """""collusion""""" in the 2016 Presidential Election

The NSA wiretapping Trump Tower

Wuhan Lab Covid-19 connection

Jeffrey Epstein's apparent suicide

Julian Assange's asylum at the Ecuadorian Embassy being revoked soon after the Ecuadorian government was granted a low interest loan in the billions of dollars by the International Monetary Fund

Chelsea Manning's imprisonment and torture for leaking damning evidence of war crimes committed by the US military

CIA training and arming future Al Qaida prior to the 9-11 attacks

Politicians and their relatives being embroiled in sexual and political scandals one after the other including Hunter Biden, Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner, John Podesta, Andrew Cuomo, Benjamin Netanyahu, etc. etc. etc. etc.

Alright, there's no evidence vaccines cause autism...but russian collusion though...

Yeah, there's not any hard evidence that vaccines at large are harmful (an assertion that is always ever just given matter-of-factly)

There's plenty of evidence of the efficacy of vaccines (an assertion that is always ever just given matter-of-factly)

But there is a way to epistemologically prove that a vaccine wont cause some as-of-yet-unknown harm to the person it is administered to in the future. It involves a rather simple matter of block-chain tracing, an understanding of slight-of-hand for a zero-faith when presenting proof, and avoiding any and all special-pleading (which is the only actual argument journalist and vaccine advocates ever give).

Just like with crypto currencies, you can trace all the components, ingredients, equipment that it contacts, and the personnel that handles it with block chain technology, closely filmed by cameras with seamless handing-off (no gaps in footage), from multiple angles, until it arrives being injected into the family members of the politicians and pharmaceutical company share holders.

THEN you'll either see a huge rise in number of people willing to take the needle (so long as it's all block chain traceable and the US govt. gets rid of the liability immunity of pharmaceuticals, hospitals, and doctors for injuries, illness, or death that results any time in the future or any effects on future offspring of those people) because now people know, as much as they can epistemologically know anything about the physical world, the truth about vaccines

or

perhaps, because journalists, politicians, and pharmaceuticals already understand that there is an undercurrent of distrust and paranoia of authority, and already understand that blockchain and persistent documentation that would leave no room for reasonable doubt, will never go through with it because there is something they are hiding but still desperately want everyone to just mindlessly submit to getting an injection of something that could literally be anything.

"BUT WHY WOULDN'T THEY JUST PUT IT IN OUR WATER OR FOOD?"

I dunno. Maybe for the same reason some drugs work better if you inject them rather than ingest them. I shouldn't have to defend the position of why I don't believe or trust something that is already proven beyond the shadow of a doubt to be untrustworthy.